Economic and Environmental Assessment of Low-Carbon Concrete Using Rice Husk Ash and Steel Industry By-Products: Toward Sustainable and Circular Construction
Keywords:
Low-carbon concrete, Rice husk ash, Ground-granulated blast-furnace, Steel slag, Life-cycle assessment, Sustainable investment, Circular economy, Carbon reductionAbstract
The cement sector accounts for approximately 7–8% of global anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, posing both environmental and financial challenges to achieving carbon-neutral construction. This study evaluates the techno-economic and environmental feasibility of low-carbon concrete incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) and steel industry by-products—ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) and steel slag (SS)—as partial substitutes for ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Experimental mixes with 10–30% binder substitution were tested for compressive strength, durability, and microstructural performance, while a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) quantified the environmental and cost impacts in accordance with ISO 14040/44 standards. The optimal blend (10% RHA + 15% GGBFS + 5% SS) achieved ≈46 MPa 28-day compressive strength—~8% higher than OPC—and exhibited enhanced chloride resistance. LCA results revealed ~30% lower global-warming potential (GWP), ~20% lower acidification potential (AP), and an estimated ~15% reduction in production cost per cubic meter of concrete. These improvements strengthen the financial case for low-carbon materials by reducing carbon liabilities, improving resource efficiency, and aligning with sustainable investment frameworks under the UN SDG 12 and EU Taxonomy for sustainable activities. The findings provide evidence-based insights for policymakers, investors, and construction firms seeking to integrate material innovation into green finance and circular economy strategies.
References
Andrew, R. M. (2019). Global CO₂ emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth System Science Data, 11(4), 1675–1710. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019
Antiohos, S. K., Papadakis, V. G., & Tsimas, S. (2020). Rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material: Strength, durability, and microstructure. Construction and Building Materials, 248, 118476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118476
Barbhuiya, S. A., & Siddika, A. (2025). Performance of rice husk ash in structural concrete: A comprehensive review. Construction and Building Materials, 421, 139845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.139845
Chandra, S., Singh, P., & Mehta, A. (2023). Energy and emission modeling of calcined agricultural ashes in sustainable cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396, 136798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136798
Cucurachi, S., Fazio, S., & Laurenti, R. (2022). Advances in life cycle assessment of construction materials. Science of the Total Environment, 851, 158019.
Damineli, B. L., Kemeid, F. M., Aguiar, P. S., & John, V. M. (2020). Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use. Cement and Concrete Composites, 116, 103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103886
Das, A., Rahman, N.-U., & Hossain, Z. (2025, June). Sustainability assessments of hot and warm mix asphalt paving technologies. In Proceedings of the 10th North American International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 1–12). IEOM Society International. https://doi.org/10.46254/NA10.20250343
European Committee for Standardization. (2021). EN 197-5: Common cements – Part 5: Composite cements CEM II/C-M and CEM VI. Brussels: CEN.
Ganesan, K., Rajagopal, K., & Thangavel, K. (2018). Evaluation of durability characteristics of rice husk ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22(8), 1675–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.016
Habeeb, G. A., & Mahmud, H. B. (2022). Study on properties of rice husk ash and its use as cement replacement material. Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, 2231–2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.228
International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Geneva: Cambridge University Press.
Kourounis, S., Tsivilis, S., & Tsakiridis, P. E. (2022). Properties and hydration of blended cements containing steelmaking slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 159, 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106904
Li, L., Ling, T.-C., & Pan, S.-Y. (2022). Environmental benefit assessment of steel slag utilization and carbonation: A systematic review. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150280
Nair, D. G., Fraaij, A. L. A., Klaassen, A. A. K., & Kentgens, A. P. M. (2018). Reactive pozzolanas from rice husk ash. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(4), 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.004
Rahman, N.-U., Das, A., & Hossain, Z. (2025, June). Evaluating the use of steel slag and rice husk ash as replacements of aggregate in concrete: A sustainable next-gen concrete. In Proceedings of the 10th North American International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 1–12). IEOM Society International. https://doi.org/10.46254/NA10.20250345
Ryu, K., Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2024). Steelmaking slag as a supplementary cementitious material. Cement and Concrete Research, 175, 107018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107018
Shi, C., Wu, Z., & Zhao, R. (2022). Performance of slag-based binders for sustainable construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134615
Thomas, B. S., & Gupta, R. C. (2023). Long-term performance and sustainability of blended cements incorporating industrial by-products: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 137998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137998
Vafaei, M., Shekarchi, M., & Lobo, C. L. (2021). Life-cycle environmental impacts of cementitious materials: A global comparison. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105574
Zhang, L., & Yu, R. (2024). Life-cycle carbon footprint of hybrid SCM-based concretes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.138625
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wegig Husain Robbiardi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

