Navigating Carbon Neutrality Transitions: The Role of Data-Driven Decision Making in Corporate Environmental Performance

Authors

  • Shirin Saiyed The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, India Author
  • Made Ratih Nurmalasari Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65875/y2ekws07

Keywords:

Data driven decision making (DDDM), Carbon neutrality, Corporate environmental, performance, Digital transformation, Sustainability governance, Carbon accounting

Abstract

Corporate carbon-neutrality commitments have proliferated, but the credibility of corporate transitions depends on whether climate ambition is translated into measurable operational change. Firms must make connected decisions about energy, production, procurement, logistics, product design, capital allocation, and value-chain relationships while balancing environmental objectives with financial viability. This article examines how data-driven decision-making (DDDM) can strengthen corporate environmental performance during carbon-neutrality transitions. It develops an integrative review of recent research on digital transformation, environmental management, carbon accounting, sustainability disclosure, and net-zero governance, supplemented by authoritative standards and climate assessments published since 2021. The synthesis identifies five mechanisms through which DDDM may create environmental value: impact visibility, analytical diagnosis, operational optimization, cross-functional coordination, and accountability-based learning. It also identifies conditions under which these mechanisms are weakened, including poor data quality, fragmented systems, weak managerial incentives, uncertain Scope 3 estimates, rebound effects, and the substitution of carbon credits for gross emissions reductions. The article proposes a conceptual framework linking data infrastructure and analytical capabilities to decision routines, implemented interventions, and verified environmental outcomes. Governance quality, regulatory pressure, supplier influence, and organizational learning are theorized as important boundary conditions. The article concludes that DDDM should be treated as a strategic organizational capability rather than a reporting tool or technology purchase. Its contribution should be assessed not by the volume of data collected, but by whether the data change decisions and support additional, measurable, and verifiable environmental improvements without undermining long-term economic resilience.

References

Carbon Disclosure Project & Boston Consulting Group. (2023). Corporate climate transition planning and emissions reporting resources. https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance

CDP. (2022). Corporate environmental disclosure and climate transition resources. https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance

CDP. (2023). Corporate Environmental Action and Disclosure: CDP Global Disclosure Report 2023. https://www.cdp.net/en/research/global-reports

CDP. (2024). Disclosure, data and corporate climate action: Global reporting resources. https://www.cdp.net/en/research

European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU as regards sustainability reporting standards. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj

European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2023). European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). https://www.efrag.org/lab6

European Parliament and Council. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 as regards corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj

Gao, J., Xu, N., & Zhou, J. (2023). Does digital transformation contribute to corporate carbon emissions reduction? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(18), 13414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813414

GHG Protocol. (2021). Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard and related guidance. https://ghgprotocol.org/standards-guidance

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Universal Standards 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/standards-development/universal-standards/

Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003

ICVCM. (2023). Core Carbon Principles, Assessment Framework and Assessment Procedure. https://icvcm.org/the-core-carbon-principles/

IFRS Foundation. (2023a). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/

IFRS Foundation. (2023b). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/

International Energy Agency. (2021). Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050

International Energy Agency. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022

International Energy Agency. (2023). Energy Efficiency 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2023

International Energy Agency. (2023). Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach—2023 Update. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-1-5-0c-goal-in-reach

International Energy Agency. (2024). Renewables 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024

International Energy Agency. (2024). World Energy Outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024

International Monetary Fund. (2022). Fiscal Policies for Paris Climate Strategies—from Principle to Practice. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2022/06/24/Fiscal-Policies-for-Paris-Climate-Strategies-From-Principle-to-Practice-519466

International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 14001 Environmental management systems—Requirements with guidance for use. (Consult ISO catalogue for current edition and amendments). https://www.iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 14064-1:2018 Greenhouse gases—Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level. (Standard reaffirmed/maintained; consult ISO catalogue). https://www.iso.org/standard/66453.html

International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). ISSB issues inaugural global sustainability disclosure standards. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/06/issb-issues-ifrs-s1-ifrs-s2/

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

OECD. (2021). ESG Investing and Climate Transition: Market Practices, Issues and Policy Considerations. https://www.oecd.org/finance/esg-investing-and-climate-transition.htm

OECD. (2022). Climate Change and Corporate Governance. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/climate-change-and-corporate-governance.htm

OECD. (2023). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en

OECD. (2024). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2024. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/corporate-governance-factbook/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Climate Change and Corporate Governance.

Pontjoharyo, V. I. (2026). How big data analytics influences financial decisions in ASEAN companies? Advanced Business Journal, 2(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.65875/mbfj3x61

Quaser, N. (2026). Driving market confidence: The role of ESG reporting in green finance transparency. Advanced Business Journal, 2(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.65875/4cr05625

SBTi. (2024). Corporate Near-Term Criteria and related target-setting resources. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources

Science Based Targets initiative. (2023). SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard, Version 1.2. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/standards/net-zero-standard

Song, Y., Du, C., Du, P., Liu, R., & Lu, Z. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 123159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123159

Sun, A. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation and environmental performance: Based on the intermediary effect of green innovation. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 26(1), 1– 22. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.347665

Supranta, V. A., & Permatasari, R. D. (2025). Carbon pricing policy and business adaptation strategies in the energy sector in Indonesia. Advanced Business Journal, 1(1), 25–31. https://advancedbusinessjournal.com/index.php/abj/article/view/5

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2021). 2021 Status Report. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/

TCFD. (2021). Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/recommendations/

UN Global Compact and Accenture. (2021). Climate Leadership and Corporate Sustainability reporting resources. https://unglobalcompact.org/library

UNEP Finance Initiative. (2022). Climate Risk and the Transition to a Net-Zero Economy. https://www.unepfi.org/publications/

UNEP. (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window—Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Societies. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022

UNEP. (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record—Temperatures Hit New Highs, Yet World Fails to Cut Emissions (Again). https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023

UNEP. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2024

United Nations Global Compact. (2021). Climate Ambition Accelerator and corporate climate action guidance. https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/climate

United Nations Global Compact. (2023). Forward Faster: Corporate sustainability targets and accountability. https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/forward-faster

VCMI. (2023). Claims Code of Practice. https://vcmintegrity.org/vcmi-claims-code-of-practice/

WBCSD. (2022). The Business Case for Net Zero: Corporate climate transition resources. https://www.wbcsd.org/

World Bank. (2024). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2024. https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/

World Economic Forum. (2023). The Net-Zero Industry Tracker 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/net-zero-industry-tracker-2023/

World Resources Institute. (2023). Corporate Climate Action and Emissions Accounting Resources. https://www.wri.org/initiatives/greenhouse-gas-protocol

WRI & WBCSD. (2023). Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Standard and guidance resources. https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard

Xia, J., Wu, Z., & Chen, B. (2022). How digital transformation improves corporate environmental management: A review and research agenda. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 943843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.943843

Yang, J., Han, J., et al. (2023). Digital transformation, financing constraints, and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2546

Downloads

Published

2026-10-23 — Updated on 2026-10-23

Versions